View Single Post
Old 06-30-2006, 07:59 PM   #27 (permalink)
Paradise Lost
"Afternoon everybody." "NORM!"
 
Paradise Lost's Avatar
 
Location: Poland, Ohio // Clarion University of PA.
For most better jazz artists, especially those whose majority of work was in the 1950s and 60s, it's really hard to pick up a completely bad album.

Also, be aware that many jazz artists, even within the same time period sound completely different, using different players and different instrument set ups even within one's own career.

Year is a partially good indicator of what type of jazz is being put forth by an artist, but knowledge of an artist helps too.

Guys like Miles Davis were all over the place, from 'cool jazz', not to be confused with smooth jazz, with I tend to classify as any cookie-cutter jazz that has no real heart, skill, or any real progression of the music itself. He did 'modal jazz', which I've felt is the most beautiful if executed correctly and with taste. He even did 'fusion', which, with a few exceptions, is probably the most commerical, slick, overly-produced, and most important, boring type of jazz there is. Please stay away from this unless you really do your homework on what is good in the genre, i.e. Weather Report... that's it. He also did many others, and so did most other jazz artists, with a few exceptions (Art Blakey). But this also doesn't mean that just because they didn't 'progress' with jazz that their later stuff was any less good or interesting.

Other significant artists:
John Coltrane, Sonny Rollins, Andrew Hill, Chick Corea (before he became all commerical), Bill Evans, Dave Holland (or anyone else from the ECM label, for that matter), Joe Henderson, Art Blakey, Horace Silver, Ornette Coleman, Cecil Taylor, McCoy Tyner, Pharaoh Sanders, Art Ensemble of Chicago (early stuff only), Donald Byrd, Herbie Hancock, Dave Brubeck, and many others.

Good resources:
MurraytheCat on Amazon.com, look for his profile, he has an incredible knowledge of jazz and has extremely good taste when it comes to his selections of good jazz.

www.allmusic.com, also a good site, that I've noticed, hardly gets it wrong when reviewing a jazz or classical album. (They're kinda iffy on rock/other stuff)

One last thing, be careful of most jazz albums released after about 1975, as for older artists they just start to re-hash older stuff without much of their old flair, or it tends to be overly electronic or slick, it loses much of what I feel made jazz great. Still, there are plenty of good albums, especially by resident artists of ECM.
__________________
"Marino could do it."
Paradise Lost is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360