I won't speak for anyone else, but your logic baffles me. I suppose I see what you're saying-that your definition of marriage requires it to be only between a man and a woman-but I don't understand why that definition isn't adaptable to new definitions. There is nothing forcing that definition on marriage besides you. If you don't have any problems with gays, why do you have a problem expanding your defintion of marriage to include them?
Last edited by Frosstbyte; 06-29-2006 at 10:55 AM..
|