aceventura3

I ask my question as a basis for understanding the issue or a starting point. On the surface I don't see a violation of my Constitutional right to privacy, nor do I see how I have been harmed. I agree that bigger issues may come into play and I don't minimize protecting our freedoms outlined in the Constitution, however, when it come to privacy rights issues I think there are other more clear violations of my privacy rights. I think this issue is being blown out of proportion by the media and the anti-Bush people. I do want to have an open mind, and asked the two questions in case I don't see it clearly.

I think the balance of power between the three branches of government goes back and forth in various directions over time. In war conditions traditionally the executive branch gains an advantage. I know some will argue if we are really at war, but ignoring that for now, given war time conditions we have always had to compromise certain rights and privalages. Within reason I think this is o.k. (I do understand that standard is subjective) In the past the executive branch went to far in a few situations, but the phone records compared to things that were done in the past, pale in comparison - even if you assume the government violated the law in this situation.

The President is subject to impeachment at any time. The electorate could demand Congress take action. Opportunity to regain balance is available between elections.

__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."