I don't see how this proves the ORIGIN of their homosexuality is based in Biology. I mean seriously, just by seeing the brain react to a situation in gay males and not in hetero males, doesn't mean that it was always like that since they were born. I would have to say that is more of a pavlovian response to the pheromone. If you ring a bell, a dog who wasn't trained to go get a treat isn't going to know what the heck the bell is for. If you watched the brains of a dog who was trained to go get a treat when a bell rang, vs one who wasn't, you will see the same sort of results as this "biological homosexuality" test where only one dog's brain would trigger that response.
I don't see this "evidence" as being evident of anything other than the test subject wasn't lying about their homosexuality. It by no means has any bearing on how the person became homosexual at all.
I am not saying it is an entirely learned behaviour, or that it's roots aren't biological, I am just saying this test doesn't conclude anything.
|