Many thanks, Adam.
Quote:
|
Also if this issue did not belong at the federal level, why did they hear the case? I think at least four of the justices thought that it did belong at the federal level. There was dissent at the State Supreme Court as well, the issue is not as simple as 'leave it up to the locals'. I understand that the majority ruled in favor of the city, however I do not understand how you see the issue as a "local" issue. Even in Kennedy's concurring opinion he leaves open the possibility that the action taken by the city may not have been permissible.
|
Ace, please reread my posts. Not once did I say this was a local issue, but a
state issue.