Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Halx
Well, I'm visualizing this in my head. I see idealogical Anarchy as a sort of neutrality and balance. A delicate perch between chaos and order. When you're suggesting is a bias toward order, making it harder for chaos to develop. That would defeat the concept.
|
Yes, but in an Internet setting, there is no consequences to the actions of the abuser.
In an anarchic physical environment, every participant must weigh the option that another can cause them PHYSICAL harm. Even in anarchy, their behaviour is modified.
Listen. If there are no laws, what is stopping me from shooting someone in the face? Nothing. Therefore, I must take steps to ensure that
I don't get shot in the face. See? My behaviour is moderated, out of necessity.
Not so on the internet. What is stopping me from fucking the site over? Nothing. There is no consequence in my actions. I therefore reach into the pit of humanity and bring out the most disturbing parts of my id. I let them breathe. I post bestiality, scat and snuf. People ban me, but not before I have fucked with their minds.
I dunno. I think there should be one rule: No banning. there could be ignore buttons galore, though...