Quote:
Originally Posted by MEAD
Until you can prove to me that it is biological, which means cold hard science, I'm going to say that it is choice, however deeply influenced and seemingly instinctive it is. You are not going to win me over with personal accounts and second-hand stories when you are trying to prove to me what is science. But what is annoying me in this tread is that people are assuming that if your vote for choice that you are against homosexuality. That simply isnt true. Futhermore, it seems as if your support of homosexuality is based on your belief that it is biological. If it turend out that it wasnt would you suddenly be against it? You all are dragging emotion into this which confuses the arugement. Biology vs choice, has nothing to do with right vs wrong.
|
This is not going to deteriorate into a shouting match, nor is anyone dragging emotion into it. I also see not one shread of evidence here that anyone is stating such that they only support it because they believe it is biological.
So, I will ask you this: Why would anyone choose a lifestyle rife with discrimination, threat of violence against them because of this 'choice', ostracization, alienation of family and every other negative reaction one can think of? Do you really think men would think 'um, soft breasts, pretty face..nah...I'll go with the masculine one over there and take it up the ass the rest of my life just so we can get beat to a pulp for it?'
Or that there is some sort of choice for those that are effeminate or women who look and act like men? I know lesbian women with male pattern baldness and acne-is that part of the choice or biological?
There HAVE been scientific studies done, as quoted above regarding pheremones, etc. There are also studies showing brain activity different in homosexual men from that of hetero, hormonal studies and polls.