Quote:
Originally Posted by f6twister
I would be surprised if the California law stood up in a supreme court ruling.
|
One would think so but this ruling was so lopsided at 6 to 1. You would think that a few more judges would have been against it.
I have read what I could find on this ruling and have yet to understand the logic behind it. How can they justify giving the police so much power when no one is in immediate danger? I understand that the driver could start drinking and escape the DUI charge but that is better than giving the police the right to enter our houses at will.