Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Seaver
It does seem to me you should look up people's past posts before making rediculous assumptions like this. I have never supported the loss of any liberties for US citizens.
|
I only made that statement based on the content of your post in this thread. I don't normally read the Politics forum and your recalcitrant attitude isn't encouraging me to do so, again, in the future...
Quote:
|
And the difference between a lone person or group of multiple people is a big one. It takes a shared ideology, a great deal of communications, and much greater organization to pull things off in a group. They are also much more dangerous this way.
|
All that being so, I don't see how this supports the claim that terrorism exists. Whether it be a group ideology or lone man madness, it exists.
And to be fair, they didn't pull anythng off, so their organization is suspect...
Quote:
|
You may be sick of my thread title, I'm the blind Bush haters always stating that if you support the war against terrorism that you are doing it because you are scared. I'm not scared, I just realize this insident is yes, FURTHER PROOF that terrorism is a real and serious threat.
|
In response to your first paragraph, at least I read the post to which I'm responding! Please re-read that part of the post. I'll quote myself, here:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KnifeMissile
Couldn't you have picked a more descriptive thread title? One of my biggest peeves about web forums is when people choose thread titles that don't sufficiently describe the thread's subject. "Further proof" of what? Every time I see a thread titled like this, I always wonder if it's worth potentially wasting my time to see if the thread interests me. Next time, please don't be afraid to actually say what you want to talk about...
|
So, let me clarify: I'm not sick of the topic of your thread, I'm annoyed by the lack of content in the title!
Now, having re-read my own post, I think I may have found what threw you off. When I said "'Further proof' of what?" I'm not implying that you have no proof. I'm merely saying that you didn't say what the subject of your proof is in your title, which is essential information for your title to have any meaning. I had thought the preceding (and following!) sentence(s) would have given enough context so that you wouldn't construe such an obstinate intention, but apparently not...