Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
well no the fire did not get the temperatures that hot, but you forget about the collapse, we are talking about a 500,000 ton structure falling 400 meters my calculus is rusty, so if some one can check it for me great, potential energy is weight * height * gravity
I get the integral between 0 and 400 of (400-x)*(500000 tons) * (400-x)/400*9.8m/s^2
this gives me 2.37 x10^14 joules of potential energy, this has to go somewhere, some went into sound, and moving air out of the way, but most of it went into deformation and heat (both cause each other) this is why it was so hot inside. Besides that the pile of rubble would also insolate the heat as well keeping it hot weeks after. Further more, great heat can be generated with deformational forces, take a coat hanger and bend it in the same place allot and feel how it heats up. It does not take much to bend a coat hanger, but for objects that do take allot to bend, much more heat is generated; this is the source of the extreme heat in the rubble, besides the fire.
|
So friction, not fire, is what caused the great heat? What about the several pictures taken of yellow-to-white hot metal falling from the not yet fallen towers?
Yellow fire = moten steel; around 1000 degrees C. If aluminum from the plane or exterior had melted, it would melt and flow away from the heat source at its melting point of about 650 degrees C and therefore would not reach the yellow color observed for this molten metal. However, the iron found in steel could reach the yellow-to-white hot temperatures. Again, I'm not going to try and explain it yet, BUT I will say that I have no reasonable (in following with the official story) explaination for this.