Originally Posted by stevo

Thats not quite what's going on here. You're the most outspoken member on TFP for the 2nd amendment. I support and agree with you, there. But host isn't talking about a retaliation because of the appeal of 2nd amendment rights, he's talking about an armed revolution because of bush's policies. I would not support an armed revolution due to any freely elected leader's policies.

The picture you just raised is different. If they sent people home to home to collect individual's fire arms, yes there would be bloodshed, and thats not something I could argue against. But I think what you have just stated and what host has in mind are completely different.