Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jimellow
I didn't read the entire letter, but of this portion I did read, this stood out:
I tend to agree with this sentiment. Why shouldn't Iran be able to pursue nuclear development? Solely because they might develop a nuclear weapon as well? Is that the sole reason, or am I missing something?
It seems to me that the countries that currently do have nuclear weapons are now speaking out against those attempting to developing their own. I'm curious if their reasoning is solely to maintain a tactical advantage, or if their reasons for opposition are otherwise justified.
|
Because it would be nice if nutballs didn't have bombs able to level a city.
Its called common sense.
It was bad enough with the USSR vrs NATO, now imagine if every piss ant unstable backassword nation had nukes that could strike any target in the world. Sooner or later one of them is going to use them, I'd rather we not see that happen anytime soon.
This is not a game of chess, its not about whats fair and playing a good game, its about survival and winning. A nuclear armed Iran is not in anyones best intersts, including the Iranian citizens as if these nutballs try to use them, just what do you think the response would be?