Quote:
|
Originally Posted by stevo
hey mods. have we had enough yet? We went on for 3 full pages discussing physics, fire temperatures, if it was possible that the fires brought down the WTC, to comparing engine photos. It seems to have moved beyond that. Obviously there are some people, who, no matter how much evidence is presented, are never going to believe 9/11 wasn't a government conspiracy. Aside from what some rookie says, yes this is paranoia - whats the difference from what this thread has become and the 911 threads in the paranoia forum? To keep this thread in the politics forum is a disgrace. I thought we were trying to clean up Politics. This is only a step backward.
|
I've had enough...stevo! Enough of watching my own government "communicate" to us by posting blatant lies on a State Department web page titled <b>You Are In: USINFO > Resource Tools > Identifying Misinformation</b>, in reference to an issue as controversial and sensitive as whether the lease holder of WTC 7 gave the NYFD permission to almost instantaneously demolish a 49 story building.
The one positive is that our government has verified that Mr. Silverstein did indeed tell the NYFD to "pull it", with regard to the destruction of WTC 7, and that the U.S. government folks who posted Silverstein's "revision" of what he said, 30 months after his televised remarks, thought that the lame shit that was intended to "explain away" the "pull it" remarks, would end the debate about what happened to WTC 7.
You got to change with the times, stevo....great leader has a 31 percent approval rating now. It's not far from Nixon's 25 percent support...at the end.
Again...why are you so angry? How about contributing to this discussion?