Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aceventura3
Did you support a preemtive strike of Iran?
If yes, do you still support a preemptive strike? If you don't now - why?
|
Yes, I would have supported a pre-emptive on Iran. I always believed them to be more of a threat (in more than just militaristic ways) than Iraq ever would be.
But now, it's all about the money and not "true security" for the nation. If it were about true security and what was best for the nation, we wouldn't have gone into Iraq, would have found a peaceful and or military solution with Iran and North Korea.
Iraq proved to me it was all about the money, as has Bush's neglect over North Korea (granted one of his biggest backers, Rev. Moon, also heavily donates to the North Korean government, not just money but nuke subs he bought from Russia).
Hell, the rest of the world at the time (including China and Russia) were more in favor of us going into Iran.
Now, Iran has powerful allies in China and Russia. We, rather Bush, allowed that to happen and now there is no turning back.
As for why don't I care........ because this administration brought it on ourselves by going after Iraq first and giving Iran the time to develop even more.
Now it's too late to be peaceful and if Iran does have them, there ain't a whole lot we can do now.