Originally Posted by host

Dilbert, the "arrogance" I was referring to was this quote that you posted that actually, as I said, reinforces my opinion....

The quote was linked to a post on letsroll.org ....it ended with:

You certainly have no reason to defend against a criticism that your tone was arrogant.....it has never been, IMO.

I found this...it took a lot of searching. This should be about finding the actual facts....not about how accurate any of our opinions are. In that spirit, if the nytimes was correct, I am wrong about the landfill picture, and you, Dilbert, are right!

Near the bottom of this nytimes article, there is this:
(I subscribe to newsbank...and I read the whole article....)

This "find" of a Flight 11 engine was never publicized widely; no mention by FEMA....

The Smithsonian had an exhibit that included recovered aircraft wreckage....no mention of an engine from WTC:
http://americanhistory.si.edu/septem...cord.asp?ID=45

Freaky things do happen, and plane crashes are no exceptions.
Claims that two passports or visas of hijackers of flight 93, and one from a WTC plane hijacker were recovered, post crash, just seems beyond "freaky" to me. The flight 93 "debris field" is the last place that I would expect that two hijackers' passports would be found.

The prosecutors emphasis on evidence exhibits from flight 93, and the CVR audio during the Moussouai trial penalty phase is also "odd", to me.

Please provide examples of my "late" edits of my past posts. The only things that I can think of are the pictures that I posted last week, on a post early in this thread. All edits are time/date stamped here at TFP. I did not edit that post, the problem is there is with the "free web space" provider....not with any edit I performed.....