Quote:
|
Originally Posted by host
BINGO....cyrnel.....hard work. The challenge I am exploring is much easier than willravels...I cannot punctuate....posting from my pda.
I am 200 miles from home on an overnite trip....walked out of the house friday without my laptop.
I compiled a new photo presentation last night but did not get a chance to post it B4 I left.
All I have to do is raise enough doubt about the govmnt claimed model and mfg. of the sole recovered WTC jet engine core to
silence most critics and ignite some media interest and the issue should take on a life of its own.......
I am more convinced that this is a cfm56 dash 3 now than yesterday. Take a look....now documented with name of official and the photographer......
http://www.uplnj.org/crr/CRRDB/data/documents/3250.htm
I have a higher res comparison pic that I will post in my presentation when I get home Sat. evening.
If you want a headstart....download the landfill pic and check out the nozzle seats where the tubing has not been ripped out. They are to the right of the holes left by the torn out nozzles. Compare the triangular nozzle seats to the ones in the wiki site high res photo on the cfm56 3 page. Then go to the pratt and whitney site and look for pics of their JTD9 7 engine. There is a page on their site that displays 4 pics of that model.....thar powered flt 175.. One photo is a shot of that engine core. Compare it to the wiki and landfill pics......or wait for my pic post later. I am not required to explain why the WTC engine is not from a 767.... |
The following quote is taken from
http://letsroll911.org/ipw-web/bulle...426&highlight=
Quote:
I'm going to BURY this stupid notion on the parts of some individuals who can do nothing but MUDDY UP THE 9-11 WATERS with their unsubstantiated claims that Boeing 737s were used in the bogus, faked and staged 9-11 "Arab" terrorist attacks on the NYC WTC Twin Towers:
Here is what the Combustion Chamber Case of a CF6 looks like from GE Aircraft Engine's own CF6 technical manual:
http://www.911-strike.com/CF6-80C2.jpg
Here are two pictures of the jet engine wreckage picked off the streets of New York City as a result of the 9-11 "Arab" terrorist attacks:
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/pho...ils.do?id=5473
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/pho...ils.do?id=5474
Go ahead and download the "High Resolution" photograph version and COMPARE the ports into which the jet engine's fuel nozzles are inserted CLOSELY & CAREFULLY.
Do notice that the fuel nozzle mounting pads are triangular in shape with three threarded inserts for three bolts at each angle of the triangular mouting pad. And pay CLOSE ATTENTION as to which way the triangle shaped pad is "pointing" (a single bolting insert in the triangle point which is 'pointing' towards THE FRONT OF the engine.)
Here is a photograph of a CFM56:
http://www.albadawi.be/GRAPHIC/cfm56-3.jpg
Use a magnifying glass if you need to, and examine which 'way' the triangular mounting pads for the fuel nozzles are pointing - (they are all pointing towards the REAR of the CFM56).
Notice the nearly 90 radial angle to the CFM56 engine's center line by which the CFM56's FUEL NOZZLES are aligned to the engine. Notice the fuel leakage/seepage metallic 'jar' which connects the fuel nozzle to TWO fuel lines - one fuel line connects to either the left hand or right hand fuel supply manifold - one fuel line connects to either the left or right hand fuel DRAIN manifold.
The CF6 utilizes TWENTY-SIX fuel nozzles which are mounted to mounting pads on the combustion chamber case - each pad measures about 2 1/4" across any side of its triangular shape - and each mounting pad is separated by about 5/8" of spacing.
The CFM56 utilizes TWENTY fuel nozzles which are mounted to mouting pads on the combustion chamber case - each pad measures about 2 1/4" across any side of its triangular shape - and each mounting pad is separated by about 1 1/2" of spacing.
The BULLSH&TING B@NEHEAD(S) who have been insisting they discovered the 'real' jet engine type (from lousy photographs) which they claim "proves" it was a Boeing 737 used in the 9-11 WTC Twin Towers and who had the audacity to claim some yak-a-doodle working in a jet engine overhaul facility on Rense.com don't know which end of a jet engine SUCKS and which end of the jet engine BLOWS.
The 'rough measurements' I've provided to all of you above were just some 'quick measurements' I took on the CF6's and the CFM56's in the engine shop of my airline.
That's 'THE END' of my dealing with these JERKS with their BOEING 737 claims!
- tocarm
|
(The following photos are big, so I will not directly link them to save the host some bandwidth)
Here is a wonderful picture of a Cfm56-5b, what you claim it is.
http://www.enginehistory.org/G&jJBro...2/Cfm56-5b.jpg
Please notice the small size of the pipes above the sign, and then look at
http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/pho...ginal/5474.jpg
And notice that the in the same location, the pipes are more than twice the diameter, and going the wrong direction. And we see a pipe encircling the engine in the crash photo, which is not in a Cfm56, but low and behold is in a CF6 engine.
http://www.enginehistory.org/G&jJBro...2/Cf6-80c2.jpg
Go back and look at the photo's.