Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post - Unanswered Questions Surrounding Terrorist Attacks

Mojo_PeiPei · 05-05-2006, 07:57 AM

I have a question for the 9/11 conspiracists(sp).

How does Al Qaeda fit into this. If it were not them who acted, if OBL, or Zawihiri, or Atta, or any other Al Qaeda affiliate didn't act, who did then? Was it the government? Was it the Mossad trying to prompt US action against its Islamic/Arabic foes? What is the governments motivation? How do you explain the fault in logic brought about in Seaver's post in post #73? It would seem that OBL and Al Qaeda convieniently(sp) took the fall for the US government on this one; not to mention there is no way to corraberate their involvement by their other actions world wide(sarcasm). Going with my sarcasm and corraberating historical fact, OBL and Al Qaeda have no involvement in terrorism against the US, sans the Embassy bombings, Somalia, USS Cole, or action in Al Qaeda.

Now this really doesn't have to degrade into the realm of conspiracy. I just want some clarafication on the matter. So Will, Host, or any other person inclined to hold believes of a similar nature, if you could, I would like you to sysnthesize a theory for me, again a theory doesn't how to fall into the realm of conspiracy. What was the motivation for the attacks? Who was the primary actor? Did the US work with Al Qaeda? Does Al Qaeda even exist? Does OBL exist?

So many questions, brought about by all this "evidence". What's the deal?

** Edited out of respect for Will and Uber**

05-05-2006, 07:57 AM	#85 (permalink)
Mojo_PeiPei Kiss of Death Location: Perpetual wind and sorrow	I have a question for the 9/11 conspiracists(sp). How does Al Qaeda fit into this. If it were not them who acted, if OBL, or Zawihiri, or Atta, or any other Al Qaeda affiliate didn't act, who did then? Was it the government? Was it the Mossad trying to prompt US action against its Islamic/Arabic foes? What is the governments motivation? How do you explain the fault in logic brought about in Seaver's post in post #73? It would seem that OBL and Al Qaeda convieniently(sp) took the fall for the US government on this one; not to mention there is no way to corraberate their involvement by their other actions world wide(sarcasm). Going with my sarcasm and corraberating historical fact, OBL and Al Qaeda have no involvement in terrorism against the US, sans the Embassy bombings, Somalia, USS Cole, or action in Al Qaeda. Now this really doesn't have to degrade into the realm of conspiracy. I just want some clarafication on the matter. So Will, Host, or any other person inclined to hold believes of a similar nature, if you could, I would like you to sysnthesize a theory for me, again a theory doesn't how to fall into the realm of conspiracy. What was the motivation for the attacks? Who was the primary actor? Did the US work with Al Qaeda? Does Al Qaeda even exist? Does OBL exist? So many questions, brought about by all this "evidence". What's the deal? Edited out of respect for Will and Uber __________________ To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition. Last edited by Mojo_PeiPei; 05-05-2006 at 10:19 AM..