|
Here's where I think we are (and others may disagree, remembering that I'm not the last word on debate points):
- The preponderance of evidence points to 767s crashing into the WTC.
- At this point, it seems that the fires in the towers could have burned hot enough to weaken the structural integrity of the steel frame. In combination with physical damage, this may have been enough to bring the towers down.
- Given the above point, an extremely persuasive argument would have to be made that the true cause of the collapse of WTC1 and WTC2 was a controlled demolition.
With respect to the previous three posters, I'd prefer not to move this thread into paranoia. Thus far, it has certainly been rooted in discussion of rational and proveable concepts. I'd like to keep it here for several reasons: 1) because someone may have more to add (and we should remain open to that possibility), 2) because we may wish to refer to it in the future and the current content is acceptable for this space, and 3) (related to 3) this was a fine discussion and I don't think it should be marginalized by assigning it to the realm of crazy speculation - willravel's effort deserves more respect than that.
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam
|