So what are we debating now? All evidence points to 767's crashing into the WTC. No logical arguement can be made that controlled demolition brought down the towers. Its been shown that the fires in the towers as a result of the crash could have reached in excesss of 1100[deg]F and that the towers collapsed onto the damaged floors first and then pancaked down. SO are we just humoring will and host, or are we done and this thread can be moved to paranoia?
__________________
"If I am such a genius why am I drunk, lost in the desert, with a bullet in my ass?" -Otto Mannkusser
|