Host that has to be THE most baseless link you've ever shown.
So lets get this straight. It can't be a 767 plane because "Such engines have a fan measuring nearly 10 feet in diameter, but their core, containing the high-pressure turbines, compressor, and combustion chamber, is about a third of that diameter."
You dont think that being thrown out of it's engine compartement, tumbling through the WTC, crashing out the other side, then falling 100 floors onto concrete would
somehow damage the engine enough that non-experts could not tell
exactly what engine it is?
Quote:
|
I've studied the "piping" on the upper right in both photos. If you want to take a closer look, use the links below to download the highest resolution photos. Most likely, the wrecked jet engine photographed on the corner or Murray and Church St., lower Manhattan, on 9/11/2001 is a CFM56-3, commonly used in nearly all post 737-200 Boeing models. There is no chance, IMO, that this engine wreckage came from, as the official story tells us, Flight 175, a Boeing 767-222 with JTD9 P&W jet engines.
|
You haven't studied anything. You've looked at photos. I'm sure there are tons of crash experts out there who
have studied these things. I'm sorry but you claiming to study these things does not give you any legitimacy.