Photo of both 737 CFM56 and 767 JTD9 available here:
http://bracebrace.skynetblogs.be/?da...=1&unit=months
In the following essay excerpt, respected 9/11 researcher Jim Hoffman validates the "Murray St." flight 175 jet engine core photos. Ironically, his essay is intent on countering Morgan Reynolds earlier supposition that the jet engine core and other aircraft debris erode the government version of the 9/11 events and the specific airliner models that flew into WTC, Shanksville, PA, and the Pentagon. I've studied the photos, (a better resolution wrecked engine photo is available
<a href="http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/photos/index.html">here</a> ) done the research, and it seems that the wrecked jet engine core is a CFM56-3...the engine that
almost all post 737-200 models use....and no 767 use. See if you don't agree!
Quote:
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/r...ml#f175_debris
A Critical Review of Morgan Reynolds'
Why Did the Trade Center Skyscrapers Collapse?
by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Hoffman">Jim Hoffman</a>
Version 1.1, June 26, 2005
Flight 175 Crash Debris
<b>In the case of the South Tower, an engine from UAL Flight 175 (tail number N612UA and FAA-registered as still valid!) has not been recovered despite the fact that the flight trajectory of the video plane implied that the right engine would miss the South Tower.</b>
Reynolds does not tell us why he thinks the trajectory of Flight 175 would have caused its right engine to miss the tower. In fact, several videos show the plane completely entering the southwest face of the South Tower, from wing-tip to wing-tip.
<b>Photos showing minor engine parts on the ground are <a href="http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/photos/index.html">unconvincing</a>, to put it mildly. Perhaps independent jet engine experts (retired?) can testify to the contrary.</b>
Why are these unconvincing as engine parts? One doesn't need to be a jet engine expert to see that they are the correct size to be either high-pressure turbines or compressor rotors from a 767, which have diameters of between 2.5 and 3 feet.
The photograph on the left shows a portion of Flight 175's engine at the corner of Church and Murray Streets. The idea that this assembly, which is about three feet in diameter, is too small to be from a 767 is unfounded. Boeing 767s use high-bypass turbofan engines such as General Electric CF6-80, the Pratt & Whitney PW4062, or the Rolls-Royce RB211. Such engines have a fan measuring nearly 10 feet in diameter, but their core, containing the high-pressure turbines, compressor, and combustion chamber, is about a third of that diameter.
<b>Further contradicting the official account, the beveled edge of the southeast side of the south tower was completely intact upon initial impact.</b>
How does this contradict the official account of the crash of Flight 175?
|
I've studied the "piping" on the upper right in both photos. If you want to take a closer look, use the links below to download the highest resolution photos. Most likely, the wrecked jet engine photographed on the corner or Murray and Church St., lower Manhattan, on 9/11/2001 is a CFM56-3, commonly used in nearly all post 737-200 Boeing models. There is no chance, IMO, that this engine wreckage came from, as the official story tells us, Flight 175, a Boeing 767-222 with JTD9 P&W jet engines.
<img src="http://scandal.atspace.com/verteng.JPG"><img src="http://scandal.atspace.com/cfm56nyc.jpg" length=60 width=360><p>
<img src="http://scandal.atspace.com/fullvert.JPG"><img src="http://scandal.atspace.com/lptshaft.jpg">
The photos of the undamaged CFM56-3 Jet Engine came from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:C...-turbofan.jpeg
The Photo of the engine shaft came from:
http://www.aeromat.fr/images/photos/...3_lptshaft.jpg
From:
http://www.aeromat.fr/frameset_global.htm Click on 'Products', look for photo CFM56-3 LPT Shaft
More on this jet engine:
http://www.cfm56.com/engines/cfm56-3/index.html
Here's a wrecked 767 engine, with front fan assembly still attached:
<img src="http://www.airdisaster.com/photos/ca129/5.jpg">
That photo is from this page:
http://www.airdisaster.com/photos/ca129/5.shtml
Flight 175 Boeing 767-222 Engine Specs:
http://www.airdisaster.com/cgi-bin/v...ited+Airlines+
JT9D jet engine photo:
http://blogsimages.skynet.be/images/...9/890_JT9D.jpg