Quote:
|
Originally Posted by host
If it can be established that the jet engine core and landing gear found on streets in lower Manhattan did not come from a 767 that our government claimed hit each WTC tower, that will open the door to an actual investigation of what happened on 9/11. Nothing else is required of skeptics, if physical evidence jeopordizes previous official "finding".
|
This is ludicrous, we have plenty of video footage of the plans hitting the towers, to come back and say, wait the big plane we see in the footage is actually small even though it looks big, because I see a picture of a supposed engine is crazy. Maybe it did throw off the engine, and maybe because we don’t personally diagnose airplane crash data we cont really tell what we are looking at because we are not experts. But seriously how many camera angles will it take to convince you. The videos show 2, 767 hit the towers. I don’t know if the photo of the engine is fake or not, quite frankly it is irrelevant.
But here we go. that picture is of a GE CF6, not a CFM56, yes there is a huge size discrepancy, and the span of a GE CF6 is 9 feet, Or is there. The engine found is only part of it; the fins and front end have been ripped off. Reducing its size from 9 feet to just the core of the engine. The picture is of a compressor and turbine for the GE CF6. A CFM56 with its fins ripped off would be much smaller than the picture you show.