Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ubertuber
You could probably examine those questions in whichever order. However, will started with evidence and math that alleges that the official story of the WTC collapse can't possibly be correct. Let's do that for now - there seem to be numerous questions about the numbers we've seen so far.
Once that hurdle is cleared, I absolutely agree that your questions about the fate of the people and equipment will be quite pressing.
I did see your comment about this not being a politics worthy thread. I think we're still in the acceptable realm for this forum - as long as we're talking about debatable facts. In fact I think that's pretty much the best way to talk about this idea here. If we can never get to a reasonably settled place with what will started with we should let it go until there is more information. However, if will makes his case convincingly, we can move into the next set of questions.
|
We are not talking facts, we are talking bad science, its been documented (and ignored) already.
If he wants to hide behind that smoke screen so be it. Its also a horrible way to investigate something like this. Its the equivalent of seeing me shoot a man in crowded room that was being videotaped and not looking at the evidence there, but seeing if I had a gun permit, showing that my gun permit was for a .45 and since I shot him with a .38 I must not be the shooter. Its assinine in the extreme, but if you think it belongs here, instead of where its been moved since 9/11 so be it. I'm done.