Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Its not ahead. Either there is a good explanation or not. I don't buy your 'facts' as valid, and if that is required prior to answering my question than your argument is faulty.
If what you claim is true IS true then there is an explantion for what I asked. That explanation is not dependent on accepting anything prior. What happened to the planes will, answer that, with evidence, and maybe I'll relook at the rest and ignore the experts that say you are wrong.
|
If it can be established that the jet engine core and landing gear found on streets in lower Manhattan did not come from a 767 that our government claimed hit each WTC tower, that will open the door to an actual investigation of what happened on 9/11. Nothing else is required of skeptics, if physical evidence jeopordizes previous official "finding".