DK, I'm not sure that I understand your question. To me, the whole Scarfo case seems like it only nibbles the edge of the 4th Amendment issues. That is - is it ok to grant a warrant to allow multiple physical entries to capture the password. I would assume that if the judge was going to grant this kind of leeway, he must have severely tightened the rest of the warrant so that, for instance, any cocaine found in the closet would be inadmissable since the computer was in the middle of the office.
Can you flesh out your disagreements here so that the sick and sleep-deprived (me) can understand it?
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo
|