View Single Post
Old 04-30-2006, 11:55 AM   #114 (permalink)
dksuddeth
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by shakran
Yeah, that would be the first part of the 2nd amendment. Well, that and the fact that the framers weren't sociopaths.
those very framers and founders said that we all were the militia and they all said that every freeman has the right to arms. thats pretty clear to me that it's an individual right, not only for militia causes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by shakran
Look, you have the right to own a fishing pole too, even though the constitution does not specifically give that right. The constitution and the BOR are simply stating some rights that the founding fathers wanted to make absolutely sure would not be taken away by the states or by a later federal government.

So even if I say that some amendment doesn't give you the right to a fishing pole, that doesn't mean I think you should be forced to turn all your fishing poles in. Just because the 2nd does not specifically give the unfettered right for everyone to have a gun, does not mean that you do not have that right, or that I think you should lose that right.
OK, now this I agree with you on.


Quote:
Originally Posted by shakran
and BTW I believe that yes, the militia does refer to the national guard, but that we've corrupted and changed what the national guard is and should be for.
then please explain to us how militia means 'national guard' when the national guard wasn't created until the very early 1900s.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shakran
But you cannot get around the basic definition of "well regulated" no matter what you claim they meant by it. Regulated is not a word who's definition has changed in 200 years. People with no regulation whatsoever cannot be said to be regulated. It's just that simple.
well regulated means well organized, well disciplined, but it doesn't mean national guard or standing army of any type. you also are still misinterpreting the second. there are two parts to the amendment and they differentiate the need for a well regulated militia does not take away the right of the people to bear arms. at least thats my interpretation of it anyway.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360