I think there has been an effort (or at least a lack of resistance) to "mythologizing" flight 93. That's not surprising though, and I don't necessarily think it indicates a conspiracy. That's just how we, as a society, prefer to digest tragedies. My opinion is that the film is just an uncritical republishing of the current state of 9/11 mythology. That doesn't make it propaganda, though it may incidentally accomplish the same things that propaganda would. It's nothing much more or less than an attempt to make money off of an experience that is still highly charged in our collective consciencousness. All of this is incidental to the question of whether our understanding of the the events of 9/11 is accurate. It's surely not, and this is unsurprising. I don't know if that is conflated with an attempt to decieve us, or if that is simply another thing that is becoming part of the 9/11 mythology.
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam
|