|
I voted "Not sure (and I am worried they would).
But I do feel that letting things progress any further (they've already told everyone to fuck off enough times that we should start assuming they really mean it) will open a larger door than is already open for very bad things to happen.
Someone asked why we should be able to have nuclear weopons and not Iran. I feel the answer to that question is so obvious that I have to respond with a blank stare.
But what we have so far here in this thread is the same people predictably saying the same things they always do. Taking sides instead of discussing anything.
Host, how can you possibly say this is a "non-issue?" It is, in the eyes of many countries, one of the largest issues on the planet at this moment. And try discussing a political issue without dragging your hate of the president into it. It's tiring to hear it over and over again.
Stevo, your entire post is hyperbole. A rabble-rousing bowl of nothing. An all-encompassing write-off of those who don't agree with you on Iran? What is the point of such claims?
Regardless, I see Iran as a huge catalyst for whatever is going to happen in the middle-east (including the Iraq debacle), and if they develop a nuclear weapon, well, alliances and enemies will be changing around the world, and the area will be even more unstable than it is now. And that's saying a lot.
__________________
Bad Luck City
|