View Single Post
Old 04-24-2006, 08:42 PM   #59 (permalink)
roachboy
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i am not saying that "judicial activism" is the only political category that has become associated with the actions of judges who occupy a particular political position--i am saying that it is not different in kind.

or: it is also a political category.

political categories are evaluated like any other argument is--you know, how they fit with the information that they are supposed to speak to. so when thinking about the "activism" of a generation of judges, say, in the context of claims to the will of the people, you evaluate them by a sense of fit--that is, you evaluate them politically.
you talk about "what is there" in the constitution in a context that you know entails a kind of pretext for cutting back law that you dont like politically (think roe v. wade) because the premise undercuts the legitimacy of precedent/interpretations advanced under the rubric of "liberal" judges or "judicial activists"--that is political.

or: the idea that it makes sense to assume that a document like the constitution is static at the levels of meaning is also a political choice.

say there were sometime lots of strict constructionist judges.
if the language in the constitution is not stable at the level of meanings (you know, not wholly unstable, but not wholly stable either) then it will effectively be declared stable in particular areas by strict constructionist style judges as a function of cases and, of course, relevant political considerations. this because no-one is in a position to simply change the rules all at once, you see--so change would be piecemeal, like alzheimer's fading in. these declarations will be the prerogative of certain people, who will be in the main not elected, not accountable to any democratic process---they will also engage in judicial activism. maybe radical acts of judicial activism, because declaring elements of the constitution to be static just seems like a radical thing to do.

but maybe i'm wrong and that would not be judicial activism or tyranny or whatever.
they're your terms, so you get to decide.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360