|
considering that 'original intent' is something that groups of people like to obfuscate by saying that plain text of quotes from the debaters of the constitution is not indicative of intent in regards to the ratified text of the constitution and then try to read something in to the constitution that doesn't exist, or didn't exist back then, but now is perfectly right because it coincides with their political ideology. That is judicial tyranny.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|