View Single Post
Old 04-24-2006, 07:24 AM   #1 (permalink)
BigBen
Comedian
 
BigBen's Avatar
 
Location: Use the search button
Canada + Oil Sands + Nuclear Power = Good or Bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ASU2003
...The US will be in trouble when gas prices get to $10/gal. They've gone up 300% in the last few years, and unless the Canadians can find an environmentally friendly way to extract oil from the oil sands, it seems like every other country that has oil could stop selling it to us for any number of reasons.
Well, I got this post off of the latest "Don't buy gas for a day" thread, and I wanted to chime in:

In Northern Alberta, there is a huge booming economy surrounding the "Tar Sands" in Fort MacMurray (sp? McMurray? Damned Scottish). There is more oil up there than in Saudi Arabia and Iran combined.

Problem is, it is very expensive to extract. It takes the energy of 1/3 of a barrel to get the other 2/3 out. If you were to give me a business proposal like that, I would laugh at you to your face. Unless we are talking about oil, and the price of a barrel is over 60 bucks.

Well, although extracting crude from the oil sands is now economical, it is still not efficient, and prices will stay at 70 bucks a barrel unless we can find a way to make the whole process much more efficient.

Will the big Nuclear Powered monster save the day?

To extract the oil from the sand, you need energy in the form of steam. This steam breaks down the viscosity of the crude oil, and voila! It flows like molasses in June instead of January. (sorry, it is monday morning and my analogies are a little rusty from the weekend). Nuclear power is simply a big steam generator. That steam is usually directed to electric turbines to produce electricity, but there is nothing stopping the steam from being used for other purposes.

Politically, will this possibility be able to turn the tide for Ol' Glowy? If I could promise 40$/bbl oil ad infinitum, and tell the American public that they can finally cut their dependence on international oil, would that help people who are critically opposed to Nuclear Power?

The Candu reactor is safe. There are vast resources of Uranium in Canada. What are we waiting for?

Oh. Right. Nuclear power is a subject that energy strategists ignore when they talk about energy shortages.

I am in favour of it, and think it is not only feasible, but almost inevitable. I would love to hear what my fellow TFP'ers have to say!
__________________
3.141592654
Hey, if you are impressed with my memorizing pi to 10 digits, you should see the size of my penis.
BigBen is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360