Thread: Hunt the Boeing
View Single Post
Old 04-21-2006, 07:47 AM   #342 (permalink)
Willravel
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Um so if it wasn't a 757 did the government round up and secretly kill the people who were suppose to be on those planes? Did they then make the 'real' 757 disapear? Are the airlines part of a giant plot to do whatever it is they are doing?

Do you see where I am going with this?

There is a passanger list, who were those people and where did they go?

Occam's razor doesn't have to cut too deep here.

And read THIS while we are at it.

Faking a moon landing would be far easier than this
Let's break this down. Your first sentence is "...if it wasn't a 757 did the government round up and secretly kill the people who were suppose to be on those planes?" If? So you're not ready to accept the picture proof yet. If you're not ready to accept the picture proof, then why aska question that assumes the proof is true?

In a situation like this, we have to take baby steps. Once you are satisfied that step one is true, then we all move on to step two. I find that this is the best way to keep everyone on the same page. Step one in the Pentagon conspiracy is discovering that the plane might not be a Boeing 757-200. If you haven't accepted this yet, then you are asking a question without basis (i.e. trying to poke holes in part one by attacking part two, which is a fallacy).

I'm trying to keep this thread as civil and logical as possible, barring the "f u, I was there when it crashed!" or "the government has made a pact with satan!" types of posts. This is Paranoia, but it doesn't have to be paranoid.

By the way, Occams razor isn't a dependable argument, because it relies solely on the ability to congecture of the people in the discussion. I won't pretend to have the kind of mental prowece that my conclusion is so very often right that people can simply take it as fact. It's best to simply weight the evidence and make an informed decision.

Edit: Forgot to mention: The argument that you're trying to associate the ideas in this thread with the fake moon landing conspiracy (the moon landing obviously wasn't fake) is called the guilt by association fallacy. This thread isn't about the moon landing or a fake moon landing. If you want to discuss that, we can in another thread.

Last edited by Willravel; 04-21-2006 at 07:49 AM..
Willravel is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360