Quote:
Originally Posted by crossova
Shakran & The_Jazz, in regards to the comment i made about Flight 93. I was referring to the phone calls made from passengers on the planes just before they crashed.
|
Planes don't generally crash when they're 6 miles up. They need to get down to the ground before they crash. If the passengers were calling just before they crashed, then they weren't at 32,000 feet.
Quote:
Shakran, have you watched the Loose Change documentary, they give their own theory as to what may have happened to one plane (flight 93).
|
I haven't seen it but I've read the synopsis. There's a lot of crazy paranoid theories being floated in that "documentary." Why would they evacuate a plane to a secret NASA base? Where are the passengers now? How did they keep them quiet? Are we suggesting that the government killed a plane full of people so they could pretend it had crashed?
I do know that that documentary ignored scores of eyewitness accounts who said a large jet hit the pentagon. They didn't even bring up the fact that the witnesses said it. We're not talking about a journalistically sound documentary here.
Quote:
Whose to say that something similar did not happen to Flight 77?
|
Logic and reason.
Quote:
On page 13 & 14 of the Northwood documents they give a scenario as to how to pretend an American plane could be destroyed. Im not going to go into the details, but here is a link to the document if you would like to read it.
|
WHY would we want to pretend the plane was destroyed? I'm not arguing that it's impossible to make it look like a plane crashed. I'm asking what possible benefit anyone could get from going to all that trouble?
Quote:
When I started this thread I never said I knew where the plane actually, I was trying to get other people's perspective on the pictures from the site. I accomplished that.
|
Well I can start a thread about the loch ness monster mating with a sasquatch, and I'm sure I'll get a lot of opinions, but that won't justify my initial statement.
Quote:
As for the physics lessons, Im not in a rush to return to any science class. But if im ever on a hijacked plane i'll be sure to call you or The_Jazz from my cellphone. Hopefully, I'll get through.
|
And this right here is the problem with most conspiracy theorists. They hear something that sounds like a Ray Bradbury novel, they think it would be cool if the public perception of an event were wildly wrong and only they and a few others knew the real truth, and then they believe it without bothering to check any facts or logic. If you have no interest in learning that which is necessary in order to have an informed opinion on the crash site (basic knowledge of physics, airplane/building construction, and logic would be helpful here) then why form wild theories that not only don't have facts to support, but no inclination to discover those facts?