I haven't heard the broomstick story.
This case gets uglier and uglier by the day. We have defense attorneys really swinging for the knockout. They say they have pictures, and no dna. Now they claim that they have concrete evidence that the two charged weren't even at the house when the rape supposedly took place. They are also starting to question the "victims" (only in quotes because we don't know if she was raped or not yet) credibility. The "victim" has several felonies including a stolen car, felony assault on a government official and felony eluding arrest.
Something else that I want to note, is the even if the medical report states that she has injuries consistent with sexual assault, that does not mean it happend at that house. According to one report, she did leave the house and came back later. Something just doesn't add up in this case, (of course I don't know all the details) I guess we'll have to wait and see what the more detailed DNA tests say when they come back today.
As for now, I'm trying to hold a non-partisan stance, but it seems I'm leaning towards the kids defense.
|