Quote:
|
Originally Posted by crossova
The phone call at 32000 feet, i thought came from Flight 93.
|
I'm not entirely sure what this statement has to do with whether or not a plane crashed into the pentagon.
Quote:
|
That does look like a piece of the plane...very convenient. It reminds me of the indestructible passport of one of the alleged terrorist that was found about four blocks away from the WTC. They can find a booklet of paper that was in an area of 2000 degree temperature but can't find enough of the plane to reassemble from that crash.
|
You're beginning to remind me of that guy in Politics a month or so ago who decided that everything in the Quran was accurate, period, and anything that wasn't in the Quran didn't exist no matter what evidence was there to support it.
You say there aren't any identifiable pieces of the plane. Someone provides you with a picture of an identifiable piece of a plane at the pentagon crash site. You deny the clear photographic evidence by telling us paper should burn.
As The_Jazz mentioned, that passport WAS damaged. Second, the world trade center itself was on fire for days, yet plenty of WTC papers were found. Despite having been in a building that had a "2,000 degree fire." Hell after the Challenger explosion divers found body parts and clothing from the astronauts. Same with Columbia. I guarantee that from a physics standpoint those were much more catastrophic events than the 9/11 plane crashes.
You have still failed to address the pertinent question here. Why would someone make an entire plane including its passengers and crew disappear, and try to cover it up by pretending to crash it into the Pentagon? How could they coordinate it so well with the terrorist attacks? I remind you that within one hour after the first plane crash, the FAA banned all new airplane takeoffs. Shortly after noon, only 3 hours later, all civillian air traffic was cleared from US skies. How exactly did they manage to hide the airplane? A plane that size can only land at a big airport. Don't you think someone might have noticed that a suspected hijack plane was landing on their runway? Or are you suggesting these conspirators built a super secret international airport somewhere underground and somehow made the plane invisible as they were flying to it? Assuming they did manage to build a facility that could land and hide a large jetliner, why did they bother to steal an airplane? If you have enough money to build an entire airport, you have enough money to BUY a 757. Why not just do that? Going to all this trouble to steal and hide an airplane simply doesn't make sense.