|
***Moved to Tilted Paranoia***
Seriously Host, are you honestly convinced that the media is not liberally biased because they don't make fun of Republican leaders for being gay? Or because one article doesn't mention the Republican affiliation of a corrupt official? Or because the press hasn't been keeping us up to date on the First Daughters' job searches? I'm sure you are familiar with the "straw man" informal logical fallacy, so it preplexes me that you would commit it here knowing that other members would surely catch it. You disprove the claim that "the media takes every single possible opportunity to throw dirt on all Republicans and their families" and then announce you have actually disproved the claim that "the American media shows a clear liberal bias.
Honestly, your list of "ignored" stories is incredibly non-newsworthy. You don't need to appeal to the vast right-wing consipracy to explain why the President's sister Dorothy hasn't gotten a lot of air time recently: it's just uninteresting!
By the way, how's Chelsea Clinton doing these days? I haven't heard anything about her for some time... I am beginning to suspect that the liberal media is suppressing stories about her failed job search... Damn you, Karl Rove. Damn you.
__________________
The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error. ~John Stuart Mill, On Liberty
|