Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The_Jazz
Given that you know for a fact that these are the same two individuals named by the FBI and not folks that share a common name, I'm sure that the FBI would love to talk to you to get a better idea of where these two guys are. 
A quick google of my own names turns up the fact that I'm a former member of the New York Rangers and current playing for a minor league team in Canada but that I also recently published an anthropology textbook, that I died in 1879, 1936 and most recently in 1983 and entire site on wild hog hunting (actually my third cousin who I thought spelled his name differently but apparently doesn't) along with the actual information about the real me. |
Yes Googling my own name brings up several people from various ethnic backgrounds. But if the FBI says The_Jazz is the person who flew this plane into the building and they show your photo on the news then I would be led to believe that you (The_Jazz) were dead and were the piloting that Boeing. But if it is confirmed that you are alive and well....then wouldn't that raise a question on the actual intelligence information that the FBI either had or presented to the public?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fastom
Yes, the cell phone calls. I always state my name before mom asks for it too.  |
lol. yeah who says their entire name when speaking with their parents. "Hi, mom, its me Jack Bauer." You would think that after so many years mom would recognize your voice.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The_Jazz
All I can do is point you to the transcripts of the calls and ask you to re-examine them. I think you'll find that it goes something like, "Hi Mom, it's George" or soemthing similar. Welcome to how I usually greet my mom on the phone when I call. As for full names, you must have personal call confused with 911 calls.
I welcome proof to the contrary.
|
The transcript which was provided actually had one caller contacting his mother and stating his first and last name. When his mother asked what do the terrorist look like he did not answer. His reply was "You believe me, right?".
As for calls being made at 32000 feet, it is possible but they said at that time in 2001 the technology used in cellphones had a probability of something like a million to one. That information I believe was on the Loose Change documentary of 9/11.
I've watched plenty of television shows like Cops, 48hours and several Court TV shows and many 911 calls to the operators, people in distress did not give their full names even in their moments of distress.
To answer
shakran's statement:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by shakran
Crossova has thusfar failed to answer the key question that should be posed about any conspiracy theory. WHY.
Why would anyone want to lie about an airplane hitting the pentagon instead of a truck bomb blowing up next to the pentagon. Whether it was a plane or a truck, the damage was done, and it was done by the same group. There's no advantage to making up information about an airplane hitting the pentagon, especially when 2 other airplanes are confirmed to have hit New York and another is confirmed through CVR to have been hijacked before it crashed. 3 airplanes used to attack the US are bad enough. Why do we need to lie to invent a fourth?
|
I do not have the answers to everything...I merely present questions that I would like to be answered, as many others have questions that would like to be answered as well.
Flight instructors said that the terrorist (those who allegedly flew into the Pentagon) who trained at their school were incompetent. It
may be possible that they were able to actually control and maintain good control of the plane as it flew just barely over 100 feet off the ground and goind over 500mph into the Pentagon. Flying well below the Pentagon's missile defense's radar system.
So why lie about a 4th plane, I do not know. Why lie about any of the events that unfolded on that day. Why not release the video surveillance footage from the nearby hotel? why why why?