|
host,
you imply that a story in Time magazine tells us everything we need to know about media bias.
you say there is no liberal press, but of course there is. just as there is a conservitive press. not everyone feels the same about things, and that will always come out in their respective writings. but so what?
the argument of whether or not there is a liberal press is just as meaningless as most things in politics nowadays. your perspective is not everyone's. and everyone's is not yours. why is that so hard for people to deal with?
try being completely objective about politics for 10 consecutive posts on this forum and you will see how difficult it is to shed your biases.
i think slants on issues are good. things would be quite dull without them. everyone has them, so why would publications be any different?
__________________
Bad Luck City
|