Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
then you are only using half of our justice systems documentum for your own purposes. we ALL are to be presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Gathering evidence is allowed but the 4th amendment standards have to be applied
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized
|
OK, where have the standards NOT been applied? Everything in the article states that the feds followed all of the requirements. I certainly agree that a two-year old email may not be the greatest proof in the world, but it apparently satisfied the judge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
There is one other 'collaberator', a peruvian citizen who helped smuggle it in as a mislabled common orchid. The main issue with this is we are acting like flower smuggling is a national security issue and treating the flower smugglers as if they were terrorists. Nobody sees something wrong with that? At the most, they should be fined, not face 35 years in prison for illegal flowers.
|
Deep breath time - remember who you're getting your information from - the accused. I don't know him, so why should I believe what he has to say?