Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Jazz
I agree with you, and that's one of the things that I admire about Scalia - his consistency across the issue to decend into activism. I may not alway agree with it, but I certainly admire it. I also agree that the "difficult to amend" sentiment, but interpretation is completely different. They intended it to be interpreted it the way they wrote it - unfortunately, we can't apply late 18th Century printing technology to the internet, so we're stuck having to rely on the courts deciding if bloggers deserve the same 1st Amendment rights as traditional journalists.
|
not to threadjack, but in a constitutional aspect can you explain why this is?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|