View Single Post
Old 04-10-2006, 09:04 AM   #3 (permalink)
The_Jazz
Asshole
 
The_Jazz's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Wow, two completely different questions asked this thread. Akin to "which way to Cucamonga" and "do I look fat in these jeans", although I doubt I'll get in trouble with the wife for answering the two posed here like I would for answering one of the others.

1) Helen Thomas is not a savior and doesn't belong on a pedstal. She's a good journalist, but don't iconisize her. I doubt she would appreciate it. She's always been known for asking the tough questions, regardless of who's in office, and she's certainly made more than her fair share of press secretaries nervous. She's the kind of journalist that I like, the kind that isn't interested in fluff or the bright shiney thing. There are liberal and conservative reporters that fall for that kind of thing all the time, but Helen seems fairly immune to it.

2) Given our overextension in the Middle East right now, I can't believe that we'd risk starting another "hot" war in the region. If we did, it could mean that we'd have troops stretched over roughly 2000 miles of territory (assuming that the air campaign heated into a ground campaign, which isn't that much of a stretch for me). We don't have the troop strength to maintain the commitments we have now, let alone expand it. I think that an air campaign would elicit an armed response from Iran, although whether it would be conventional or terrorist-based, I don't know. Remember that Iran is admittedly one of the prime backers of Hamas, which is an admitted terrorist organization. I don't think that the Iranians have the wherewithall to recruit US Muslims (I doubt anyone does), but they could potentially send Jordanians or Palestinians (or whoever else) to do their dirty work for them here.

A tactical nuclear strike might be the worst strategic decision I think that the Pentagon could possibly ever make. The use of nuclear weapons basically undermines all the negotiations of every administration back to Eisenhower and possibly the later Truman years. The Israeli's don't have the ability to make a strike that far from their home territory, and the US tacit approval necessary for such an overflight of Iraqi territory would be nothing more than taping a target to our backs for the Muslim world at large. It would roughly 1500 miles round trip, and the Israeli planes would probably need to be refueled somewhere along the way.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo
The_Jazz is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360