|
You could gague the moral ones for yourself. On the questions of murder I would feel morally guilty in the cases, but I don't think there carries any legal responsibility. You have to facilitate the crime in someway to be legally responsible, if you went out of your way in not testifying or lying in the chance of investigation you might carry some legally responsibility, but nothing near the level of murder.
As for the questions of pot, I feel no guilt morally or legally. Personally speaking I have no problems with people smoking pot, legally the cases above don't carry with them any legal guilt.
Morality is subjective, so on that question you would could really at any point absolve yourself of guilt depending on your compass.
Legally speaking, if you act in such a way that is illegal, you are responsible until absolved of crimes or serving of punishment; however guilt in the case of murder or anything drug related would require some active form of participation, apathy does not equate to any legal standard of guilt.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
|