Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
What has to be weighted against that is the danger of gun ownership, legal or illegal. The production and distrubution of guns has a direct tie with illegal arms, by which the very criminals who gun owners are trying to stop aquire their weapons. I see it as no different than any other arms producer: bombs, missles, munitions, etc. It is apparent that the producers don't care who the consumers are. As someone who believes in small government, I think it is their responsibility to stop this from happening. Now, obviously they will not stop producing weapons that continue to fall into the wrong hands on their own. Money > morality in most buisnesses, so I would suggest (like I've done in another gun thread) that we simply hold the manufacturer responsible if their weapon is used in a crime (unless the weapon has been stolen from the person who legally purchased it). If they want to stop lawsuits, then they work harder to make sure that their guns are only legally sold and used.
|
there are already laws to prevent manufacturers from making illegal gun sales, as well as preventing dealers from doing the same. Do we hold knife manufacturers liable if their knife is used in a crime? How about vacuum cleaners?
http://www.wyff4.com/news/7501397/detail.html
Quote:
An Anderson man is dead after being strangled with a vacuum cleaner hose, and his common-law wife is charged with his murder.
|
now, doesn't THAT suck. (pun intended)
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|