If it counts Host, what he said ^ ^ ^
I still don't really fully understand your question to be honest, the words are not lining up for me. As it goes, I'm not opposed to a right of privacy; it is innate, and as someone who is big on original intent I'm positive the FF would agree it's there. I just take issue with the issues a lot of the times, and having read the decisions of Griswold and Roe, I thought some of the reasoning was a little creative and thus suspect. It has to do with some application and a lot of contradictions, not to mention there is the little issue of states rights for me.
On that note I will never fully side with the courts on all issues, and to say something is decided law is a joke, that is a political tool meant to box people in their thinking so as to appease pundits and demogagues. Historically the courts do not always make the right decision, look at Dred Scott, legally sound, morally abhorrent; akin to say something like abortion. Only took one hundred years before what had been decided law was overturned.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
|