View Single Post
Old 03-27-2006, 05:29 AM   #205 (permalink)
samcol
Junkie
 
samcol's Avatar
 
Location: Indiana
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
And this group or person was worried about the left wing wackjob Mayor of San Fransico for some reason and was willing to expose their/his/its plan to save him.



So just what sort of conspiracy is this? Is there a rational reason to risk it to save some very minor political figure?
Notice how no real prominent or very public officials or businessmen died in the 9/11 attacks? The only one I can think of is a fairly high level government employees wife, but I can't think of her name at the moment. It's very possible that this is a coincidence, except for this article. This is the kind of tidbits of weird shit that I constantly see when reading articles:

Silverstein, the shady leaseholder who purchashed the massive insurance policy of the WTC complex months before the attacks and who was filmed giving the famous "pull it" comment, was supposed to be eating breakfast in the twin towers that day but lucky for him he had a doctors appointment instead. This article is about rebuildling the WTC and this bizarre bit of information is just kind of thrown in there. Isn't it kinda of weird that he missed breakfast that day? Oh and there just happened to be drills on 9/11 depicting the exact same event, and Norad just happened to stand down that day, and and first steel buildings to fall from fire happened that day too.

It's not my job or the job of the citizens to take all these pieces of the puzzle and fit them together. We don't have the abilility or the access to the resources neccessary to do so. It's only our job to look at the puzzle and say it's not fitting together correctly and we collectively (new independent commission) need to figure out why. Again, it doesn't really matter why the mayor was called at this point (that's the job of a real commission), all the matters is we expose the fact that he was notified of an event that was taking place in New York and ask why this information was ignored by the 9/11 commission.

We need to expose that a conspiracy likely happend on 9/11 and on the investigation, and call for an new independent investigation, not compound the problem by arguing about who did it and why.

Last edited by samcol; 03-27-2006 at 05:44 AM..
samcol is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360