Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
And this group or person was worried about the left wing wackjob Mayor of San Fransico for some reason and was willing to expose their/his/its plan to save him.
So just what sort of conspiracy is this? Is there a rational reason to risk it to save some very minor political figure?
|
Notice how no real prominent or very public officials or businessmen died in the 9/11 attacks? The only one I can think of is a fairly high level government employees wife, but I can't think of her name at the moment. It's very possible that this is a coincidence, except for this article. This is the kind of tidbits of weird shit that I constantly see when reading articles:
Silverstein, the shady leaseholder who purchashed the massive insurance policy of the WTC complex months before the attacks and who was filmed giving the famous "pull it" comment, was supposed to be eating breakfast in the twin towers that day but lucky for him he had a doctors appointment instead.
This article is about rebuildling the WTC and this bizarre bit of information is just kind of thrown in there. Isn't it kinda of weird that he missed breakfast that day? Oh and there just happened to be drills on 9/11 depicting the exact same event, and Norad just happened to stand down that day, and and first steel buildings to fall from fire happened that day too.
It's not my job or the job of the citizens to take all these pieces of the puzzle and fit them together. We don't have the abilility or the access to the resources neccessary to do so. It's only our job to look at the puzzle and say it's not fitting together correctly and we collectively (new independent commission) need to figure out why. Again, it doesn't really matter why the mayor was called at this point (that's the job of a real commission), all the matters is we expose the fact that he was notified of an event that was taking place in New York and ask why this information was ignored by the 9/11 commission.
We need to expose that a conspiracy likely happend on 9/11 and on the investigation, and call for an new independent investigation, not compound the problem by arguing about who did it and why.