View Single Post
Old 03-26-2006, 07:26 AM   #27 (permalink)
Gilda
32 flavors and then some
 
Gilda's Avatar
 
Location: Out on a wire.
This one is very difficult for me. It's strictly a hypothetical, as I can't have children, but my wife will be in the foreseeable future, so it's something we have to consider as a couple.

On the one hand, there's the slippery-slope argument. If we're going to start aborting fetusus because they're going to be severely developmentally disabled, do we then start moving the line? Does it then become easier to abort a child with Down's syndrome? Or dwarfism? Or maybe we can abort children who are likely to have other undesirable traits, such as homosexuality or transsexuality? Or perhaps just aborting a child who isn't the sex you'd prefer, as is happening in India currently with some women aborting female fetuses?

Do I think it's going to come to that? Of course not, at least not on a large scale. I do have to think that, given their current attitudes towards alternate sexualities, my parents likely would have aborted me and Sissy had they known how we'd turn out, and the world would have lost a pretty good English teacher (not a big loss) and someone who someday is going to save a lot of lives.

So it's not as if I haven't considered the ramifications of aborting fetuses for having undesirable characteristics.

At the same time, I find slippery-slope arguments to be very problematic if there isn't a causal link that can be shown between point A and points B, C, and D.

If we found out that Grace were pregnant with a child like the one in the OP, I think I'd probably want to abort and try again. This wouldn't be a child who would be able to have any quality of life as we know it, and *might* detract from our quality of life. Becoming a parent is, at least in part, a choice made because it is believed that having children will be a positive influence on our lives.

As for the spirit part, I can see it from both an existential point of view and from an essentialist point of view. Existentially, if this is the only existence this person will ever have, does it make sense to bring him/her into a world where he/she will never be able to enjoy life the way we know that to be? If, as I believe, we posess and essense separate from our physical bodies, are we doing the child a favor by trapping that essense in a damaged vessel? I don't know the answers there for sure, but I think that my personal answer in both cases would be no.

I'll have to reluctantly say I'd abort, but I surely wouldn't be happy with that decision.

Gilda
Gilda is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360