View Single Post
Old 03-23-2006, 12:13 PM   #52 (permalink)
joshbaumgartner
Insane
 
joshbaumgartner's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spektr
I'm sorry you misinterpreted what I wrote Mojo. My comment was in no way related to the existence or lack there of of a privacy clause within the Bill of Rights or the Constitution. That is a seperate discussion in and of itself. The debate over abortion can be solved on a infinitely more simple level than that:

The goal of a representative democracy is, ultimately, the unconditional accessibility to equal rights for the entire citizenry. No special treatment, every citizen is granted the same inalienable freedoms. If our elected officials create legislation which, in effect, limits the rights of a SPECIFIC group of citizens and ONLY that group, then they have instituted a policy that is radically anti-American.
Unfortunately such a sound principle has been twisted by certain groups into the argument that not interfering with a woman's body is somehow unfair as it allows a woman to do something a man can not (abort a pregnancy), but yet to force a woman to carry a fetus to term is a perfectly balanced law because afterall it bans a man from having an abortion too, so is not gender discriminatory. As much as the absurdity of this logic is self-evident to myself and others, it doesn't dissuade its promoters.

Gender-specificity in legislation is not prohibited, as we recognize that there are unique aspects between men and women and that ignorance of the law does not necessarily promote the common good. I can walk around bare-chested all I want, but my wife would be cited for indecent exposure were she to do the same. I can see the point of those who would want to do away with this restriction, but the fact remains that no court finds this rule a violation of the Constitution or that too many Americans see it as a way to restrict the rights of women. It may be unequal but it is not unreasonable the law didn't give women breasts and men not, but the law does have to reflect the reality of the fact they have them and men don't. Likewise, the law didn't give women the ability to have a pregnancy and thus have the option to abort the pregnancy, thus there is nothing inappropriate about the law recognizing the reality that women have that option.

There are some valid reasons to oppose abortion, but the gender-equality arguement is not one of them.
joshbaumgartner is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360