Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
his corpse should be enough proof. he's dead now, he MIGHT NOT be if he had a gun.
|
He might have survived without a gun. There were a thousand times a thousand variables at play in the scenereo that led up to this man's death, and pretending like we know having a gun might have effected the outcome is silly without some fundamental understanding of both the situation above, and general situations involving armed robberies. You can't just claim a statistic and therefore it's true. I could just as easily have said, " he would have had even less a chance to live had he been armed", and without proof, it would have been just as true as your statement. I'm from Missouri, show me the proof.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
again, half a chance is better than no chance. he might still have died, but he might have lived also. As it stands, he's just dead.
|
The victim might have lived if the robber with the gun was on heroin, so we should legalize heroin!!!
Edit: I'm an anti gun, hippie from California, and you are a gun loving guy from Texas...are we walking cliches?