The surface absurdity of this argument only helps magnify the absurdity of the pro-choice position on the unborn.
If the unborn has no inherent rights or value prior to whatever arbitrary date one assigns such rights and value, then it is not unfair for a man to think he has the right to 'op-out' of a pregnancy. While the woman may claim its her body and she has the right to do whatever she wants for it, for a majority of men child support will take the fruits of his labor to provide, and it is his body which must be used to provide such support. His body, and in many jobs his life, is at risk for providing for this child.
The semantics games played by the pro-abortion forces is what allows this argument to be made. The thought of forcing a woman to have an abortion, or even letting men 'op-out' seems absurd to anyone with a sense of self responsibility or even a shred of decency.
I have no sympathy for such men who would feel this sort of op out is a right of theirs. I have far more sympathy for men who wish to raise the child who have no say in its abortion.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host
Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
|