Originally Posted by guthmund

Maybe...maybe not.

If President George W. Bush stood up in 2007 and said that he believes the two candidates in the upcoming election have colluded with terrorists and you shouldn't vote for them, would you take him seriously? Especially if all he offered as 'proof' was the recollection of a some vague memory while he was in the middle of a major medical procedure?

Worse yet, if after the election, President Bush said he couldn't stand aside because the winner was a known terrorist accomplice? How long do you imagine President Bush could manage to hold on to his position even if he called out "the radical religious ppl?"